Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Elisabeth A. Finn
Associate

If you’re reading this, chances are you’ve received a letter in the mail claiming to be a “Demand  Letter” or a letter sent under the guise of Chapter 93A. The Massachusetts Consumer Protection  Act, i.e., Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A, is a broad piece of legislation which is  designed to prevent “[u]nfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in  the conduct of any trade or commerce.” Any business in the state of Massachusetts could be  targeted by consumers who feel they have been “deceived” or treated “unfairly.” What does the  law mean when it uses these terms, and how do you respond to an allegation that your business  has violated this law? Not all demand letters are Chapter 93A letters, so what distinguishes them,  and why does the distinction matter? If you received a demand letter and it references Chapter  93A or the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, here are some things to keep in mind:  

1. What Is a Chapter 93A Claim?  

The Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, i.e., Chapter 93A, is a separate and distinct claim  that any person or business can make against another business. Its general purpose is to protect  consumers who have been damaged by a business’s wrongdoing and further damaged by the  business behaving in a way that was “deceptive” or “unfair.” For instance, a consumer might  claim that the business lied or knowingly behaved wrongly. There is no strict definition of what  it means to commit an “unfair or deceptive practice,” and it often depends on the specific facts  involved. An attorney with experience in this area can evaluate the claim and give guidance  based on their knowledge and past experience.  

2. How Does a Chapter 93A Claim Begin?  

If you’ve received a demand letter, this does not necessarily mean you have been sued…yet. If a  person believes that your business has violated Chapter 93A, the law says that they must first  send a demand letter: 

Section 9(3) At least thirty days prior to the filing of any such action, a written demand  for relief, identifying the claimant and reasonably describing the unfair or deceptive act  or practice relied upon and the injury suffered, shall be mailed or delivered to any  prospective respondent. 

However, this rule only applies if a person is suing a business. If one business is suing another  business, Section 9 does not apply. Therefore, the first step is to ask: Who is making the  allegation? Is it a business or is it an individual? If you have been served with a lawsuit from a  person, and you never received a demand letter, you should speak to an attorney to discuss  whether you might be able to have the case dismissed outright. Likewise, if you are an individual  and you believe you have a claim, you will need to talk to an attorney about drafting a demand  letter before you can go any further.  

Sometimes a business will still send a demand letter before filing suit, even if it does not have to.  If you have received a demand letter — or any letter that references Chapter 93A — you should  speak to an attorney right away. Your response can impact your rights.  

3. I Received a Demand Letter — Now What? 

If you have received a demand letter, the clock has started. You now have 30 days to respond to  the letter if you want to limit the potential damages down the road. 

Any person receiving such a demand for relief who, within thirty days of the mailing or  delivery of the demand for relief, makes a written tender of settlement which is rejected  by the claimant may, in any subsequent action, file the written tender and an affidavit  concerning its rejection and thereby limit any recovery to the relief tendered if the court  finds that the relief tendered was reasonable in relation to the injury actually suffered by  the petitioner.  

This means that if you make a reasonable settlement offer within 30 days, and the Plaintiff  rejects it, a court may later limit their recovery to only what you originally offered – even if they  win the case. Even if you don’t think you did anything wrong, a settlement offer might help you  down the road if the Plaintiff files suit. An attorney can help you evaluate what offer might be  reasonable, and this number varies depending on the facts of each individual case. There is no  rule that states what a reasonable offer of settlement is, but an experienced attorney can use their  past experiences to help predict a reasonable number, given your circumstances.  

4. But Why Should I Offer to Settle If I Did Nothing Wrong? 

Normally, if you are sued in Massachusetts, the Plaintiff can only recover whatever amount of  money puts them back to where they would have been if they had not been injured. This is  referred to as damages. In some cases, this number is very clear. If Person A broke something  worth $100, then Person A might need to pay back the $100, or replace the item. However, this  is NOT the case for a Chapter 93A claim, which has specific language allowing a Plaintiff to  recover up to three times their regular damages: 

[I]f the court finds for the petitioner, recovery shall be in the amount of actual damages or  twenty-five dollars, whichever is greater; or up to three but not less than two times such  amount if the court finds that the use or employment of the act or practice was a willful or  knowing violation of said section two or that the refusal to grant relief upon demand was  made in bad faith…  

If the Plaintiff succeeds on their claim, a Defendant could be looking at owing up to three but not  less than two times the usual damages. But it doesn’t end there.  

In addition to the potential treble damages, a Chapter 93A claim is one of the few claims in  Massachusetts where a Plaintiff is entitled to recover the full cost of their attorney’s fees if they  win. It does not matter if the claim is for $100 or $100,000. If the Plaintiff wins any money  whatsoever, the Defendant now pays for all the legal fees. This is why it’s important to get your  own attorney involved early, and to discuss your options before it’s too late — and before the  Plaintiff’s legal fees start to add up.  

5. Conclusion  

If you have received a letter that claims to be a demand letter — or otherwise mentions Chapter  93A — you should contact an attorney right away to preserve your rights and ensure you won’t  have to pay three times the damages. There is a limited time to act, and the clock may have  already started running. You should not ignore a demand letter, or the next document you receive  could be a lawsuit. 

About the Author
Elisabeth A. Finn is a Litigation Associate based in the firm’s Boston and Worcester offices. Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, representing both businesses and individuals in a variety of legal matters including shareholder disputes, construction disputes, personal injury, premises liability, employment litigation, and general business litigation.
I Received a 93A Letter — Now What?
Share on Facebook
Share on X
Share on LinkedIn
By Elisabeth A. Finn
Associate

If you’re reading this, chances are you’ve received a letter in the mail claiming to be a “Demand  Letter” or a letter sent under the guise of Chapter 93A. The Massachusetts Consumer Protection  Act, i.e., Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A, is a broad piece of legislation which is  designed to prevent “[u]nfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices in  the conduct of any trade or commerce.” Any business in the state of Massachusetts could be  targeted by consumers who feel they have been “deceived” or treated “unfairly.” What does the  law mean when it uses these terms, and how do you respond to an allegation that your business  has violated this law? Not all demand letters are Chapter 93A letters, so what distinguishes them,  and why does the distinction matter? If you received a demand letter and it references Chapter  93A or the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, here are some things to keep in mind:  

1. What Is a Chapter 93A Claim?  

The Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, i.e., Chapter 93A, is a separate and distinct claim  that any person or business can make against another business. Its general purpose is to protect  consumers who have been damaged by a business’s wrongdoing and further damaged by the  business behaving in a way that was “deceptive” or “unfair.” For instance, a consumer might  claim that the business lied or knowingly behaved wrongly. There is no strict definition of what  it means to commit an “unfair or deceptive practice,” and it often depends on the specific facts  involved. An attorney with experience in this area can evaluate the claim and give guidance  based on their knowledge and past experience.  

2. How Does a Chapter 93A Claim Begin?  

If you’ve received a demand letter, this does not necessarily mean you have been sued…yet. If a  person believes that your business has violated Chapter 93A, the law says that they must first  send a demand letter: 

Section 9(3) At least thirty days prior to the filing of any such action, a written demand  for relief, identifying the claimant and reasonably describing the unfair or deceptive act  or practice relied upon and the injury suffered, shall be mailed or delivered to any  prospective respondent. 

However, this rule only applies if a person is suing a business. If one business is suing another  business, Section 9 does not apply. Therefore, the first step is to ask: Who is making the  allegation? Is it a business or is it an individual? If you have been served with a lawsuit from a  person, and you never received a demand letter, you should speak to an attorney to discuss  whether you might be able to have the case dismissed outright. Likewise, if you are an individual  and you believe you have a claim, you will need to talk to an attorney about drafting a demand  letter before you can go any further.  

Sometimes a business will still send a demand letter before filing suit, even if it does not have to.  If you have received a demand letter — or any letter that references Chapter 93A — you should  speak to an attorney right away. Your response can impact your rights.  

3. I Received a Demand Letter — Now What? 

If you have received a demand letter, the clock has started. You now have 30 days to respond to  the letter if you want to limit the potential damages down the road. 

Any person receiving such a demand for relief who, within thirty days of the mailing or  delivery of the demand for relief, makes a written tender of settlement which is rejected  by the claimant may, in any subsequent action, file the written tender and an affidavit  concerning its rejection and thereby limit any recovery to the relief tendered if the court  finds that the relief tendered was reasonable in relation to the injury actually suffered by  the petitioner.  

This means that if you make a reasonable settlement offer within 30 days, and the Plaintiff  rejects it, a court may later limit their recovery to only what you originally offered – even if they  win the case. Even if you don’t think you did anything wrong, a settlement offer might help you  down the road if the Plaintiff files suit. An attorney can help you evaluate what offer might be  reasonable, and this number varies depending on the facts of each individual case. There is no  rule that states what a reasonable offer of settlement is, but an experienced attorney can use their  past experiences to help predict a reasonable number, given your circumstances.  

4. But Why Should I Offer to Settle If I Did Nothing Wrong? 

Normally, if you are sued in Massachusetts, the Plaintiff can only recover whatever amount of  money puts them back to where they would have been if they had not been injured. This is  referred to as damages. In some cases, this number is very clear. If Person A broke something  worth $100, then Person A might need to pay back the $100, or replace the item. However, this  is NOT the case for a Chapter 93A claim, which has specific language allowing a Plaintiff to  recover up to three times their regular damages: 

[I]f the court finds for the petitioner, recovery shall be in the amount of actual damages or  twenty-five dollars, whichever is greater; or up to three but not less than two times such  amount if the court finds that the use or employment of the act or practice was a willful or  knowing violation of said section two or that the refusal to grant relief upon demand was  made in bad faith…  

If the Plaintiff succeeds on their claim, a Defendant could be looking at owing up to three but not  less than two times the usual damages. But it doesn’t end there.  

In addition to the potential treble damages, a Chapter 93A claim is one of the few claims in  Massachusetts where a Plaintiff is entitled to recover the full cost of their attorney’s fees if they  win. It does not matter if the claim is for $100 or $100,000. If the Plaintiff wins any money  whatsoever, the Defendant now pays for all the legal fees. This is why it’s important to get your  own attorney involved early, and to discuss your options before it’s too late — and before the  Plaintiff’s legal fees start to add up.  

5. Conclusion  

If you have received a letter that claims to be a demand letter — or otherwise mentions Chapter  93A — you should contact an attorney right away to preserve your rights and ensure you won’t  have to pay three times the damages. There is a limited time to act, and the clock may have  already started running. You should not ignore a demand letter, or the next document you receive  could be a lawsuit. 

About the Author
Elisabeth A. Finn is a Litigation Associate based in the firm’s Boston and Worcester offices. Her practice focuses on complex civil litigation, representing both businesses and individuals in a variety of legal matters including shareholder disputes, construction disputes, personal injury, premises liability, employment litigation, and general business litigation.